Article : Foundation conditions of buildings in undermined areas: An example of evaluation
Authors : Bogusz, J.Centre of Applied Geomatics, Military University of Technology, email@example.com, Saibi, H.Laboratory of Exploration Geophysics, Department of Earth Resources Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan, firstname.lastname@example.org, Verbanac, G.University of Zagreb, Faculty of Science, Department of Geophysics, Zagreb, Croatia, email@example.com, Mustasaar, M.Department of Geology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia, firstname.lastname@example.org, Dobróka, M.Department of Geophysics, University of Miskolc, Egyetemvaros, Miskolc, Hungary, email@example.com, Dębski, W.Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland, firstname.lastname@example.org, Tomecka-Suchoń, S.AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland, email@example.com, Kalab, Z.VSB – Technical University of Ostrava, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Abstract : Evaluation of a set of individual geological and petrophysical parameters is necessary in many geoscientific studies or those with constructional purposes. However, correlation and mutual evaluation of these parameters are very complicated. Our methodology, which is part of the expert evaluation, is based on compilation of four significant effects: local subsurface geology, groundwater table (and accumulation of surface water), deformation of the surface due to mining (subsidence), and landslides. Different values of specified significances were assigned to all four selected effects. The class of foundation conditions was selected according to the summary of values of specified significances for a given point. This value describes how the selected parameters influence vibration effect on the surface and resistance of buildings to this seismic loading. The pilot map of foundation conditions, which was elaborated as part of the evaluation of Stonava area in 2008, is presented.
Bibliography : ČSN 73 1001 (1987), Foundation of structures. Subsoil under shallow foundations, ÚNM, Praha.
ČSN 73 3050 (1987), Earth works. General requirements, ÚNM, Praha.
Kaláb, Z. (2007), Evaluation of load on structures cause by mining seismicity for maps of clash of opinions – methodology, Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Śl., Ser. Górnictwo 276, 33-42.
Kaláb, Z., and M. Lednická (2008), Introduction of thematic layer called “seismic characteristic of foundation conditions” in maps of clash of opinions. In: Proc. Int. Conf. 70 Years of FCE STU, STU, Bratislava, 1-6 (CD-ROM).
Kaláb, Z., R. Kořínek, and E. Hrubešová (2009), Technical seismicity as natural extreme in Karviná region, Górnictwo i Geologia 4, 2a, 87-94.
Kašpárek, M. (1998), Map of engineering geological zoning. Collection of geological and ecological special purpose maps of natural resources on a scale 1:50 000 – part 15-44 Karviná, Czech Geological Institute, Prague.
Lednická, M. (2006), Classification of buildings and structures for elaboration of maps of clash of opinions. In: Proc. Ph.D. Workshop 2006, Institute of Geonics of the ASCR, Ostrava, 31-34.
Lednická, M., B. Lunacková, Z. Kaláb, E. Hrubešová, and R. Kořínek (2006), Contribution to evaluation of technical seismicity effect on buildings – case study, Earth Sci. Res. J. 10, 1, 7-14.
Martinec, P., J. Honěk, R. Živor, et al. (2006), Termination of Underground Coal Mining and its Impact on Environment, ANAGRAM, Ostrava, 128 pp.
Müllerová, J., and D. Ides (2004), Slope deformations of Ostravsko region. In: Documenta Geonica 2004 – Maps of Influence of Reduction of Deep Hard Coal Mining in the Ostrava Region on the Landscape and the Environment, Institute of Geonics of the ASCR, Brno Branch, 38-51.
Qute : Bogusz, J. ,Saibi, H. ,Verbanac, G. ,Mustasaar, M. ,Dobróka, M. ,Dębski, W. ,Tomecka-Suchoń, S. ,Kalab, Z. ,Kalab, Z. , Foundation conditions of buildings in undermined areas: An example of evaluation. Acta Geophysica Vol. 60, no. 2/2012